Your Expertise Is the Product. AI Just Helps You Get It Out of Your Head.
There’s a version of using AI for content that’s genuinely bad: you give it a topic, it produces something generic, you publish it under your name. The content doesn’t sound like you, doesn’t reflect how you think, and doesn’t build any authority because it could have been written by anyone.
That’s not what I do. And it’s not what I’m suggesting.
The version that works is different. You bring the expertise — the opinions, the observations, the frameworks, the experience — and AI turns that raw material into something coherent and publishable. The ideas are yours. The writing is assisted. There’s a meaningful difference.
Why the ideas have to come first
I’m a UX designer. I’ve spent years thinking about how people interact with systems, how products fail users, how AI is changing the design work I’ve done for a long time. I have things to say about all of that that nobody else would say in exactly the same way, because they come from my specific experience and perspective.
When I sit down to write something, I know what I want to say. I bullet-point the observation, the context behind it, the point I’m making, who I’m writing for. That takes five minutes. That’s the expertise part.
What takes longer — much longer, historically — is the writing. Turning those bullets into sentences, finding the right structure, making it readable. That’s not where the value lives for me. The value is in the ideas.
AI handles the writing part. I bring the ideas. The output sounds like me because I trained Claude on how I write before asking it to write anything — that’s what a voice profile does. And it says what I think because the raw material is my thinking, not a topic prompt.
The authenticity objection
The most common concern I hear about AI content is that it won’t be authentic — that readers will be able to tell, or that it undermines the expertise behind it.
The problem is publishing AI-generated content that doesn’t reflect your actual views. Using AI to get your actual views into a publishable form faster is a different thing entirely.
A ghostwritten book is still the author’s ideas. A speech written with a speechwriter’s help is still the speaker’s message. The assistance doesn’t negate the source. What makes content authentic is whether the ideas, the perspective, and the voice are real — not whether every word was typed by the person whose name is on it.
My content is authentic because the ideas are mine and the voice is mine. AI is just the thing that gets it from my head to the page without making writing the obstacle.
What this means practically
If you have expertise worth sharing — and if you’ve been doing your work for more than a few years, you do — the only question is whether writing is the thing stopping you from sharing it.
If it is, that’s worth naming as a separate problem from the expertise itself. You don’t need to become a better writer. You need a way of getting what you already know out of your head without the writing being the part that stops you.
The expertise is the hard part, and you already have it.
Eight questions, two minutes. You'll get a specific answer about your bottleneck, plus the one thing to fix first.